Basic Information (Switzerland) Elecon Asia SA (hereinafter referred to as “Elecon”) is a powerful intelligent three-d...
·Historic FRAND ruling despite settlement in Panasonic vs Oppo ·Bayer’s rollercoaster defense of Xarelto ·VoiceAge v...
Saule Kulzhambekova, partner at Bolotov & Partners in Almaty, said that in the recent trademark infringement case won by...
Basic Information (Switzerland) Elecon Asia SA (hereinafter referred to as “Elecon”) is a powerful intelligent three-d...
·Historic FRAND ruling despite settlement in Panasonic vs Oppo ·Bayer’s rollercoaster defense of Xarelto ·VoiceAge v...
In the dynamic world of fashion, design protection plays a significant role in safeguarding creativity and innovation. C...
A round-up of the UPC in its first year: 373 lawsuits and just a few initial rulings. Nevertheless, JUVE Patent has sele...
Case III: Administrative Dispute over Invalidation of "Face Recognition" Invention Patent Case Brief: Beijing Zhong XX T...
Last week’s $42.4 million jury verdict in favour of Willis Electric was a welcome result for Robins Kaplan. A jury at t...
December 7, 2023 - News of a patent infringement ruling against Apple Watches a few weeks ago caused a flurry of investo...
A utility model patent of Chinese on-demand services giant Meituan’s Mobike has partially survived the challenge of its...
Background Trinity sued Covalent for patent infringement of U.S. Patent 9,087,321 (“the ’321 patent”) and U.S. Patent...
Although China is generally not the first choice for NPE (Non-Practicing Entity) to initiate litigation, when facing glo...
Earlier this year, the Delhi High Court decided on a case on the patentability of software and business methods. This de...
In January 2023, the Delhi High Court restored Entresto (sacubitrilvalsartan) patent in India just days after it previou...
Mention paper, and most of us will think of notebooks. But its uses extend far beyond note-taking and jamming printers. ...
“In two recent design patent cases, two courts were at thesamestage of litigation dealing with thesamedesign patent, ye...
On April 26, 2022, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) announced the Top 10 Patent Reexamina...
“When ‘determining whether software limitations like those at issue here recite sufficient structure, we can look beyo...
“The obviousness inquiry does not require that the prior art combination is the ‘preferred, or the most desirable’ co...
The EPO Opposition Division has upheld a CRISPR/Cas9 patent belonging to the University of California (Berkeley), Univer...
On 27 May 2021, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court (hereinafter “Court”) announced its appellate decisions on the...
A substantial share of the proceeds will go to the inventors, José Moura, a professor in Carnegie Mellon's Department o...
Recouping losses of over 20M yuan per year by one design patent seems incredible to many companies, in Luo Ning's heart,...
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ordered an appeals court to reconsider its decision to grant patents to Myriad Genetics...
Jiangmen Intermediate People's Court last month ordered Taizhou Emas Co Ltd in Zhejiang province to immediately cease ma...
Chinese telecom company ZTE recently agreed to pay a licensing fee to the Swedish company Ericsson to settle long-runnin...
SAIC reminds Dongfeng on IP rights from Britain's LDV Intellectual property disputes between domestic carmakers and fore...
In US patent litigation practice, the alleged infringer, facing the prospect of a patent infringement lawsuit, will ofte...
A law book on judgements in intellectual property cases. Experts say the field is maturing and awards are increasing in ...
It can be hard to imagine an ant achieving victory over an elephant. But a small Chinese high technology company recentl...
The Plaintiff (the petitioner): Buhler Company (Switzerland) The Defense (Appellee): Patents Reexamination Committee of ...
UTILITY MODELS PATENT RIGHTS INFRINGEMENT CASE--He Peiping Vs. Wu County Institute of Economic and Technology Developmen...
total 1 pages, 30 items
CHINA intellectual PROPERTY LAWYERS NETWORK
+86-13910160652
ciplawyers@163.com
Home
